Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sources GCP BigQuery Table ID should be maintained while updating app-settings #2646

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Feb 9, 2021

Conversation

dccurtis
Copy link
Contributor

@dccurtis dccurtis commented Feb 9, 2021

A miss from yesterday. We need to ensure that the BigQuery Table ID stays in tact when we update GCP application settings. Table ID is not tracked by platform sources since it is detected by Cost Management and not something the user enters.

Testing
GCP crud testing in QA environment was successful

@dccurtis dccurtis requested a review from a team February 9, 2021 17:13
@dccurtis dccurtis self-assigned this Feb 9, 2021
lcouzens
lcouzens previously approved these changes Feb 9, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@lcouzens lcouzens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sweet!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 9, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #2646 (9887e35) into master (ed37904) will increase coverage by 0.0%.
The diff coverage is 100.0%.

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #2646   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    94.8%   94.8%           
======================================
  Files         282     282           
  Lines       21663   21665    +2     
  Branches     2455    2455           
======================================
+ Hits        20531   20533    +2     
  Misses        680     680           
  Partials      452     452           

@dccurtis dccurtis merged commit 373ba63 into master Feb 9, 2021
@dccurtis dccurtis deleted the sources_logging branch February 9, 2021 17:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants