-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/thermostat events xml ### Testing #36909
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Feature/thermostat events xml ### Testing #36909
Conversation
PR #36909: Size comparison from f05b65e to bde3911 Full report (5 builds for cc32xx, stm32, tizen)
|
PR #36909: Size comparison from f05b65e to 880c50d Full report (49 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nrfconnect, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
There may be more changes as the last bit of the spec PR gets finalized.
PR #36909: Size comparison from f05b65e to 7fa387a Full report (69 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
@@ -309,6 +309,9 @@ limitations under the License. | |||
<feature bit="8" code="PRES" name="Presets" summary="Thermostat supports setpoint presets"> | |||
<optionalConform/> | |||
</feature> | |||
<feature bit="9" code="TEVT" name="Events" summary="Thermostat supports events"> | |||
<optionalConform/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't this be flagged provisional in the XML somehow for now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there a way to do so? I ran alchemy this round instead of handcoding and it didn't mark it with the apiMaturity attribute like the other fields.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's possible that nothing supports apiMaturity on bitfields yet... if so, please reach out to @andy31415 and @hasty about fixing that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ZAP doesn't support apiMaturity outside of clusters, attributes, and structs. Of those, clusters and attributes currently have a method of specifying that they're provisional, in the sense that they have a conformance column; perhaps we should discuss in the DM TT call about how best to do this?
src/app/zap-templates/zcl/data-model/chip/thermostat-cluster.xml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/app/zap-templates/zcl/data-model/chip/thermostat-cluster.xml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Once https://github.com/CHIP-Specifications/connectedhomeip-spec/pull/10444 is approved and merged I'll make it match the final spec that's chosen. |
PR #36909: Size comparison from 0dd3414 to a42ad1b Full report (70 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
PR #36909: Size comparison from 40979b4 to 7d32a69 Full report (64 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, tizen)
|
ran zap_regen_all script
PR #36909: Size comparison from 40979b4 to fd859ae Full report (64 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, tizen)
|
PR #36909: Size comparison from 5398152 to b497f92 Full report (73 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
PR #36909: Size comparison from ba98125 to 548f3c0 Full report (73 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
PR #36909: Size comparison from c0ee0a0 to ff4ec70 Full report (74 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
XML for https://github.com/CHIP-Specifications/connectedhomeip-spec/pull/10444