-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed ReviewFabricRestrictions command args #34647
Merged
Merged
+152
−118
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Was supposed to be a list of AccessRestrictionEntryStructs, not AccessRestrictionStructs. Spec text updated in PR project-chip#10176 Since AccessRestrictionEntryStruct is fabric-sensitive, we use CommissioningAccessRestrictionEntryStruct.
Review changes with SemanticDiff. Analyzed 4 of 97 files. Overall, the semantic diff is 31% smaller than the GitHub diff. File Information
|
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
andyg-apple,
anush-apple,
arkq,
axelnxp,
bauerschwan,
bzbarsky-apple,
carol-apple,
cecille,
chapongatien,
chrisdecenzo,
chshu,
chulspro,
cliffamzn,
Damian-Nordic,
dhrishi,
doru91,
fessehaeve,
harimau-qirex,
harsha-rajendran,
hawk248,
hicklin,
jepenven-silabs,
jmartinez-silabs and
jmeg-sfy
July 30, 2024 20:37
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
ReneJosefsen,
robszewczyk,
saurabhst,
selissia,
sharadb-amazon,
tcarmelveilleux,
tecimovic,
tehampson,
tima-q,
tobiasgraf,
vivien-apple,
wiba-nordic,
woody-apple,
younghak-hwang,
yufengwangca and
yunhanw-google
July 30, 2024 20:37
PR #34647: Size comparison from 9032548 to 5e95bd2 Full report (84 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
bzbarsky-apple
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2024
andy31415
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2024
andy31415
added
review - pending
skip-protocol-compatibility
Marker that protocol backwards compatibility checks are to be skipped
and removed
review - approved
labels
Jul 31, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
app
controller
darwin
examples
review - approved
skip-protocol-compatibility
Marker that protocol backwards compatibility checks are to be skipped
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Was supposed to be a list of AccessRestrictionEntryStructs, not AccessRestrictionStructs. Spec text updated in PR 10176 Since AccessRestrictionEntryStruct is fabric-sensitive, we use CommissioningAccessRestrictionEntryStruct.