-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove some more unnecessary lock code. #34303
Merged
mergify
merged 1 commit into
project-chip:master
from
bzbarsky-apple:remove-more-lock-code
Jul 11, 2024
Merged
Remove some more unnecessary lock code. #34303
mergify
merged 1 commit into
project-chip:master
from
bzbarsky-apple:remove-more-lock-code
Jul 11, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When removing a credential, we were checking to make sure the existing credential count was not too large. But this doesn't really need to be checked (as the comments around this code implied), since if we have some number of credentials already one fewer should clearly be OK.
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
andy31415,
andyg-apple,
anush-apple,
arkq,
axelnxp,
bauerschwan,
carol-apple,
cecille,
chapongatien,
chrisdecenzo,
chshu,
chulspro,
cliffamzn,
Damian-Nordic,
dhrishi,
doru91,
fessehaeve,
harimau-qirex,
harsha-rajendran,
hawk248,
hicklin,
jepenven-silabs,
jmartinez-silabs,
jmeg-sfy,
joonhaengHeo,
jtung-apple,
kiel-apple and
kkasperczyk-no
July 11, 2024 17:39
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
nivi-apple,
p0fi,
pidarped,
plauric,
rcasallas-silabs,
ReneJosefsen,
saurabhst,
selissia,
sharadb-amazon,
tcarmelveilleux,
tecimovic,
tehampson,
tima-q,
tobiasgraf,
vivien-apple,
wiba-nordic,
woody-apple,
younghak-hwang,
yufengwangca and
yunhanw-google
July 11, 2024 17:39
andy31415
approved these changes
Jul 11, 2024
PR #34303: Size comparison from a0d6b70 to 6dc2f6c Full report (85 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
woody-apple
approved these changes
Jul 11, 2024
j-ororke
pushed a commit
to j-ororke/connectedhomeip
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 15, 2024
When removing a credential, we were checking to make sure the existing credential count was not too large. But this doesn't really need to be checked (as the comments around this code implied), since if we have some number of credentials already one fewer should clearly be OK.
j-ororke
pushed a commit
to j-ororke/connectedhomeip
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2024
When removing a credential, we were checking to make sure the existing credential count was not too large. But this doesn't really need to be checked (as the comments around this code implied), since if we have some number of credentials already one fewer should clearly be OK.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When removing a credential, we were checking to make sure the existing credential count was not too large. But this doesn't really need to be checked (as the comments around this code implied), since if we have some number of credentials already one fewer should clearly be OK.