-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Get additional workflow information about diskspace #29705
Get additional workflow information about diskspace #29705
Conversation
PR #29705: Size comparison from e8f516a to d95b3fc Full report (2 builds for cc32xx, mbed)
|
PR #29705: Size comparison from e8f516a to add72b0 Increases (1 build for telink)
Full report (71 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, psoc6, qpg, telink)
|
PR #29705: Size comparison from e8f516a to 7fc505a Increases (4 builds for psoc6)
Decreases (44 builds for bl602, bl702, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, psoc6, qpg)
Full report (54 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, psoc6, qpg)
|
PR #29705: Size comparison from e8f516a to bdd2f05 Increases (3 builds for cc32xx, nrfconnect, qpg)
Decreases (7 builds for cc32xx, mbed, nrfconnect, qpg)
Full report (7 builds for cc32xx, mbed, nrfconnect, qpg)
|
PR #29705: Size comparison from e8f516a to 99b255f Increases (6 builds for cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, nrfconnect, qpg)
Decreases (14 builds for cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, qpg)
Full report (14 builds for cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, qpg)
|
PR #29705: Size comparison from e8f516a to e0da6b2 Increases above 0.2%:
Increases (30 builds for bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, nrfconnect, psoc6, qpg)
Decreases (71 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, psoc6, qpg, telink)
Full report (71 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, psoc6, qpg, telink)
|
PR #29705: Size comparison from e8f516a to 5ecfa29 Increases above 0.2%:
Increases (17 builds for bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, k32w, mbed, nrfconnect, qpg)
Decreases (29 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, qpg)
Full report (29 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, qpg)
|
PR #29705: Size comparison from e8f516a to 5944c61 Increases above 0.2%:
Increases (43 builds for bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, psoc6, qpg)
Decreases (71 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, psoc6, qpg, telink)
Full report (71 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, psoc6, qpg, telink)
|
* Get additional workflow information about diskspace * Get even more diskspace usage info * Initial attempt at collecting info on disk space within checkout submodule * Fix CI issue * Another attempt to get CI running workflow grabbing diskspace usage * Couple other fixes * Another attempt to get CI running * Try this new approach * quick fix * Dump more info * Few more touch ups * quick fix * Restyle * Restyle * quick fix * quick fix
We are starting to see more CI workflows fail due to being out of disk space. It seems to be a little bit of a Heisenbug in that when trying to collect this information on PRs that have failed the issue goes away. It make more sense to just always collect this information.
We intentional dump to log and not to a file as we are trying to debug when we have run out of disk space, so we cannot rely on file and upload.