-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Android] Remove Fabric ID negative value check #28724
Merged
mergify
merged 1 commit into
project-chip:master
from
joonhaengHeo:remove_fabric_id_negative_check
Aug 21, 2023
Merged
[Android] Remove Fabric ID negative value check #28724
mergify
merged 1 commit into
project-chip:master
from
joonhaengHeo:remove_fabric_id_negative_check
Aug 21, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
andy31415,
andyg-apple,
anush-apple,
arkq,
bzbarsky-apple,
carol-apple,
cecille,
chrisdecenzo,
chshu,
chulspro,
cliffamzn,
Damian-Nordic,
dhrishi,
electrocucaracha,
gjc13,
harsha-rajendran,
hawk248,
hicklin,
jepenven-silabs,
jmartinez-silabs,
jmeg-sfy,
jtung-apple,
kkasperczyk-no,
ksperling-apple,
lazarkov,
lpbeliveau-silabs,
LuDuda and
mhazley
August 17, 2023 07:36
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
plauric,
rcasallas-silabs,
robszewczyk,
saurabhst,
selissia,
sharadb-amazon,
tcarmelveilleux,
tecimovic,
tima-q,
tobiasgraf,
turon,
vivien-apple,
woody-apple,
younghak-hwang,
yufengwangca and
yunhanw-google
August 17, 2023 07:36
PR #28724: Size comparison from d0da504 to 260adf4 Increases (9 builds for cc32xx, esp32, psoc6, telink)
Decreases (9 builds for bl702, bl702l, efr32, psoc6, telink)
Full report (60 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, psoc6, qpg, telink)
|
our plan is to switch to kotlin to which has corresponding data type for uint64_t |
I agree. However, the current issue has been reported, and I have already deleted and used this code due to the same issue. |
yunhanw-google
approved these changes
Aug 18, 2023
saurabhst
approved these changes
Aug 18, 2023
jmartinez-silabs
approved these changes
Aug 18, 2023
HunsupJung
pushed a commit
to HunsupJung/connectedhomeip
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix #28696
Java long variable range is -9,223,372,036,854,775,808 to 9,223,372,036,854,775,807.
uint64_t variable range is 0 to 18,446,744,073,709,551,615.
It would be best if there was an unsigned type in Java, but since it doesn't exist, you have no choice but to use negative values when using Java in your App.
For this reason, it has been modified to remove negative checks.