Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expand attribute persistence provider api #27611
Expand attribute persistence provider api #27611
Changes from 6 commits
48915f3
1f989a9
b5ed2d5
c58e9a2
1b1abfe
e398672
6e3d3c7
4630dc1
d60a795
1643373
e1ec87e
4574741
b5d456c
15230fc
476bf9c
76db4d3
333ac54
4f9c481
2d6f26a
2d4cca0
09488ec
582b92c
7c1bf20
81d062f
de3b1c9
35070d1
7f2423f
9ab6af9
e289e60
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will completely break on a big-endian system for non-one-byte values, no? The values passed to AttributePersistenceProvider are native-endian for integers! This is very clearly documented above.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The data is not being persisted....
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, ReadValue is implemented by the application in general. You can't make assumptions about how it will use the data it's handed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why the extra chip::? But again, the data here is native-endian.