Restyle Allow external ownership of CHIPDeviceController operational key #18487
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![restyled-io[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/5851?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
- For controllers that make use of their own key management, such as OS-aided key management, it is currently impossible to pass-in the Operational Key pair to use for a given controller. This PR adds APIs to avoid FabricTable from trying to manage the lifecycle of the operational key, and allow the caller/initializer of CHIPDeviceControllerFactory to properly inject its own operational key that it manages, without attempts of storage or dynamic memory management. Issue #18444 Issue #7695 Testing done: - Unit tests still pass, cert tests as well - This was tested internally by us using the APIs to manage a key for Android. That change will be a follow-up
Co-authored-by: Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]>
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
anush-apple,
arkq,
Byungjoo-Lee,
bzbarsky-apple,
carol-apple,
chrisdecenzo,
chshu,
chulspro,
Damian-Nordic,
dhrishi,
electrocucaracha,
emargolis,
franck-apple,
gjc13,
harimau-qirex,
hawk248,
harsha-rajendran,
isiu-apple,
jelderton,
jepenven-silabs,
jmartinez-silabs,
jtung-apple,
kpschoedel and
lazarkov
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
jelderton,
jepenven-silabs,
jmartinez-silabs,
jtung-apple,
kpschoedel,
lazarkov,
LuDuda,
mlepage-google,
mrjerryjohns,
msandstedt,
sagar-apple,
saurabhst,
selissia,
tcarmelveilleux,
tecimovic,
tehampson,
turon,
vijs,
vivien-apple and
wbschiller
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
woody-apple,
xylophone21,
yufengwangca and
yunhanw-google
restyled-io
bot
force-pushed
the
restyled/opkey-ownership
branch
from
96319e7 to
585f422
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A duplicate of #18482 with additional commits that automatically address
incorrect style, created by Restyled.
Please review accordingly.
Since the original Pull Request was opened as a fork in a contributor's
repository, we are unable to create a Pull Request branching from it with only
the style fixes.
The following Restylers made fixes:
To incorporate these changes, you can either:
Merge this Pull Request instead of the original, or
Ask your contributor to locally incorporate these commits and push them to
the original Pull Request
Expand for example instructions
NOTE: As work continues on the original Pull Request, this process will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with updated style fixes as
necessary. If the style is fixed manually at any point (i.e. this process finds
no fixes to make), this Pull Request will be closed automatically.
Sorry if this was unexpected. To disable it, see our documentation.