Improve CHIP error constant defines to be consistent and accurate

[yufengwangca]

Problem
Lack of error constant defines for persistent storage access, some error constant names are not consistent in naming

Summary of Changes

• Align CHIP error constant name with consistent naming convention
• Add CHIP error constants for persistent file access

[github-actions]

Size increase report for "gn_nrf-example-build"

File	Section	File	VM

Full report output

BLOAT REPORT

Files found only in the build output:
    report.csv

[github-actions]

Size increase report for "gn_linux-example-build"

File	Section	File	VM

Full report output

BLOAT REPORT

Files found only in the build output:
    report.csv

[github-actions]

Size increase report for "nrf-example-build"

File	Section	File	VM

Full report output

BLOAT REPORT

Files found only in the build output:
    report.csv

Comparing ./master_artifact/chip-nrf52840-lock-example.out and ./pull_artifact/chip-nrf52840-lock-example.out:

sections,vmsize,filesize
.debug_str,0,167
.debug_macro,0,56
[Unmapped],0,1

[github-actions]

Size increase report for "linux-example-build"

File	Section	File	VM

Full report output

BLOAT REPORT

Files found only in the build output:
    report.csv

Comparing ./master_artifact/chip-standalone-demo.out and ./pull_artifact/chip-standalone-demo.out:

sections,vmsize,filesize
.debug_str,0,167
.debug_macro,0,56
[Unmapped],0,1

[github-actions]

Size increase report for "esp32-example-build"

File	Section	File	VM

Full report output

BLOAT REPORT

Files found only in the build output:
    report.csv

Comparing ./master_artifact/chip-wifi-echo.elf and ./pull_artifact/chip-wifi-echo.elf:

sections,vmsize,filesize

[woody-apple]

/pullapprove-test

version: 3

# https://developer.github.com/v3/previews/#draft-pull-requests
github_api_version: "shadow-cat-preview"

############################################################
#  Conditions
############################################################

pullapprove_conditions:
    ############################################################
    #  Required status checks
    ############################################################
    - condition: "'*restyle*' in statuses.successful"
      unmet_status: "failure"
      explanation: "Style must be inline before reviewing can be complete"

    ############################################################
    #  License Checks
    ############################################################
    - condition: "'*license/cla*' in statuses.successful"
      unmet_status: "pending"
      explanation: "CLA must be agreed to by all contributors"

    ############################################################
    #  Draft PRs
    ############################################################
    - condition: "'WIP' not in title"
      unmet_status: "pending"
      explanation: "Work in progress"

    - condition: "not draft"
      unmet_status: "pending"
      explanation: "Work in progress"

    ############################################################
    #  Conditions to Skip Review
    ############################################################
    - condition: "base.ref == 'master'"
      unmet_status: "success"
      explanation: "Review not required unless merging to master"

    ############################################################
    #  Bypass reviews
    ############################################################
    - "'hotfix' not in labels"

############################################################
#  Notifications
############################################################

notifications:
    ############################################################
    #  New contributors
    ############################################################
    - when: pull_request.opened
      if: "author_association == 'FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR'"
      comment: |
          Hey @{{ author }}, thanks for the PR! The review will start once
          the tests and CI checks have passed. If they don't, please review
          the logs and try to fix the issues (ask for help if you can't
          figure it out). A reviewer will be assigned once the tests are
          passing and they'll walk you through getting the PR finished
          and merged.

groups:
    ############################################################
    #  Base Required Reviewers
    ############################################################
    shared-reviewers-amazon:
      type: optional
      conditions:
        - files.include('*')
      reviewers:
        teams: [reviewers-amazon]
    shared-reviewers-apple:
      type: optional
      conditions:
        - files.include('*')
      reviewers:
        teams: [reviewers-apple]
    shared-reviewers-comcast:
      type: optional
      conditions:
        - files.include('*')
      reviewers:
        teams: [reviewers-comcast]
    shared-reviewers-google:
      type: optional
      conditions:
        - files.include('*')
      reviewers:
        teams: [reviewers-google]
    shared-reviewers-samsung:
      type: optional
      conditions:
        - files.include('*')
      reviewers:
        teams: [reviewers-samsung]

    required-reviewers:
        description: >
            [Required
            Reviewers](https://github.com/project-chip/connectedhomeip/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#review-requirements)
            This is the main group of required reviews for general pull
            requests.
        type: required
        requirements:
          - len(groups.approved.include('shared-reviewers-*')) >= 3
        reviews:
          required: 0