Restyle Allow runtime init of some Server members (2/2)
#16077
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![restyled-io[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/5851?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
- This PR is on the path towards having Server::Server no longer statically initialize its members with storage, and instead relying on Server::Init(). This will simplify organization of unit tests and also the convergence of Controller/Server storage to address issue #16028 Issue #16028 This PR separates init of AccessControl so that the delegate need not be passed to the Constructor, which allows simpler splitting of storage init and decoupling from Server::Server() static inializer list. This is a structural, non-functional change, touching only AccessControl. Testing - Ran cert tests, still pass - Ran unit tests, still pass
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A duplicate of #16070 with additional commits that automatically address
incorrect style, created by Restyled.
Please review accordingly.
Since the original Pull Request was opened as a fork in a contributor's
repository, we are unable to create a Pull Request branching from it with only
the style fixes.
The following Restylers made fixes:
To incorporate these changes, you can either:
Merge this Pull Request instead of the original, or
Ask your contributor to locally incorporate these commits and push them to
the original Pull Request
Expand for example instructions
NOTE: As work continues on the original Pull Request, this process will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with updated style fixes as
necessary. If the style is fixed manually at any point (i.e. this process finds
no fixes to make), this Pull Request will be closed automatically.
Sorry if this was unexpected. To disable it, see our documentation.