-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make IntrusiveList lifetime documentation a little clearer. #13525
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Also adds verification that a nonempty list is never destroyed, since that would leave dangling pointers back to the list from the nodes that weren't removed from it.
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
anush-apple,
balducci-apple,
Byungjoo-Lee,
carol-apple,
chrisdecenzo,
chshu,
chulspro,
Damian-Nordic,
dhrishi,
electrocucaracha,
erjiaqing,
franck-apple,
gjc13,
harimau-qirex,
hawk248,
jelderton,
jepenven-silabs,
jmartinez-silabs,
kpschoedel,
LuDuda,
mlepage-google,
mrjerryjohns,
msandstedt,
pan-apple,
robszewczyk,
sagar-apple and
saurabhst
January 13, 2022 04:58
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
selissia,
tcarmelveilleux,
tecimovic,
turon,
vijs,
vivien-apple,
wbschiller,
woody-apple,
xylophone21 and
yufengwangca
January 13, 2022 04:58
PR #13525: Size comparison from 8e43cab to 76afaef Increases (28 builds for efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, p6, qpg, telink)
Full report (32 builds for efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, p6, qpg, telink)
|
andy31415
approved these changes
Jan 13, 2022
Fast track: documentation updates and a clean change. Intrusive List has unit tests which exercise the changed code. |
selissia
pushed a commit
to selissia/connectedhomeip
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2022
…chip#13525) Also adds verification that a nonempty list is never destroyed, since that would leave dangling pointers back to the list from the nodes that weren't removed from it.
step0035
pushed a commit
to hank820/connectedhomeip
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2022
…chip#13525) Also adds verification that a nonempty list is never destroyed, since that would leave dangling pointers back to the list from the nodes that weren't removed from it.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Also adds verification that a nonempty list is never destroyed, since
that would leave dangling pointers back to the list from the nodes
that weren't removed from it.
Problem
Documentation was not as clear as I'd like about the lifetime assumptions.
Change overview
Adjust the docs.
Testing
No behavior changes except adding a verification that nonempty lists are not destroyed.