Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restyle Fix YAML checking of return values handle lists and structs correctly #11571

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

restyled-io[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@restyled-io restyled-io bot commented Nov 9, 2021

A duplicate of #11570 with additional commits that automatically address
incorrect style, created by Restyled.

⚠️ Even though this PR is not a Fork, it contains outside contributions.
Please review accordingly.

Since the original Pull Request was opened as a fork in a contributor's
repository, we are unable to create a Pull Request branching from it with only
the style fixes.

The following Restylers made fixes:

To incorporate these changes, you can either:

  1. Merge this Pull Request instead of the original, or

  2. Ask your contributor to locally incorporate these commits and push them to
    the original Pull Request

    Expand for example instructions
    ```console
    git remote add upstream https://github.com/project-chip/connectedhomeip.git
    git fetch upstream pull/<this PR number>/head
    git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
    git push
    ```
    

NOTE: As work continues on the original Pull Request, this process will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with updated style fixes as
necessary. If the style is fixed manually at any point (i.e. this process finds
no fixes to make), this Pull Request will be closed automatically.

Sorry if this was unexpected. To disable it, see our documentation.

bzbarsky-apple and others added 3 commits November 8, 2021 23:02
The change to CheckValue is to make it clearer which value is the
actual value and which value is the expected value.

The change to TestAttrAccess::ReadListInt8uAttribute is to make the
actual value it produces match the expected value, in a way that keeps
the values different from the indices.
The CheckValueAsString change is just to show what the actual value
was that does not match the expected value.

The CheckValue (enum version) change is to make it compile, now that
it's actually being used.
@restyled-io restyled-io bot added the restyled label Nov 9, 2021
@restyled-io restyled-io bot closed this Nov 9, 2021
@restyled-io restyled-io bot deleted the restyled/better-expected-matching branch November 9, 2021 04:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants