-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Initial cluster status code support #10732
Initial cluster status code support #10732
Conversation
PR #10732: Size comparison from dff4066 to f31b457 2 builds (for p6, telink)
10 builds (for efr32, k32w, qpg)
8 builds (for linux)
|
f31b457
to
d32ec2e
Compare
PR #10732: Size comparison from 341c00d to d32ec2e 12 builds (for efr32, k32w, p6, qpg, telink)
|
86a1aa5
to
50fe6af
Compare
PR #10732: Size comparison from 341c00d to 50fe6af 12 builds (for efr32, k32w, p6, qpg, telink)
|
50fe6af
to
0834a90
Compare
PR #10732: Size comparison from 341c00d to 0834a90 8 builds (for k32w, p6, qpg, telink)
|
0834a90
to
92bf12f
Compare
PR #10732: Size comparison from 341c00d to 92bf12f 2 builds (for p6, telink)
10 builds (for efr32, k32w, qpg)
|
92bf12f
to
a2892a0
Compare
a2892a0
to
fbe0bd9
Compare
PR #10732: Size comparison from 341c00d to fbe0bd9 8 builds (for k32w, p6, qpg, telink)
4 builds (for efr32)
4 builds (for mbed)
12 builds (for esp32, nrfconnect)
|
/rebase |
fbe0bd9
to
4fb20c4
Compare
PR #10732: Size comparison from 62a6f85 to 4fb20c4 16 builds (for k32w, linux, p6, qpg, telink)
4 builds (for efr32)
16 builds (for esp32, mbed, nrfconnect)
|
Size increase report for "gn_qpg-example-build" from 62a6f85
Full report output
|
Size increase report for "nrfconnect-example-build" from 62a6f85
Full report output
|
Size increase report for "esp32-example-build" from 62a6f85
Full report output
|
* possibly a cluster-specific one. If apData is not null it aStatusIB will always be a generic | ||
* SUCCESS status with no-cluster specific information. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yunhanw-google The wrapping here is very odd....
Problem
Add cluster status code support in IM command
Change overview
See above
Testing
Add unit test for status code validation