You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
<what's wrong or missing, please include any applicable:
expected behavior
actual behavior
steps to reproduce
system configuration
screenshots, images, logs, etc.
test step #31, #34, #37, #40, #43, #46, #52, #54, #57 send command "./chip-tool basic write-by-id" but use wrong attribute ID, cause returned status is not expected UNSUPPORTED_WRITE(0x88)
Proposed Solution
<suggested fix, suggested enhancement>
just remove prefix "0x" as decimal attribute ID for this steps, or use right hex attribute ID
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In particular, @wilbur-se I don't see any write-by-id in any of the TC-GC steps, so which test is the above referencing?
wilbur-se
changed the title
[TE9][TC-GC-2.1] some test steps need returned status UNSUPPORTED_WRITE(0x88) but (UNSUPPORTED_ATTRIBUTE)(0x86)
[TE9][TC-DM-2.1] some test steps need returned status UNSUPPORTED_WRITE(0x88) but (UNSUPPORTED_ATTRIBUTE)(0x86)
May 24, 2022
Problem
<what's wrong or missing, please include any applicable:
test step #31, #34, #37, #40, #43, #46, #52, #54, #57 send command "./chip-tool basic write-by-id" but use wrong attribute ID, cause returned status is not expected UNSUPPORTED_WRITE(0x88)
Proposed Solution
<suggested fix, suggested enhancement>
just remove prefix "0x" as decimal attribute ID for this steps, or use right hex attribute ID
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: