-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement remaining access control for IM read #10239
Comments
mlepage-google
added a commit
to mlepage-google/connectedhomeip
that referenced
this issue
Jan 11, 2022
PR project-chip#12660 seems to have refactored ReadSingleClusterData in such a way that the access control check may be skipped. (Possibly due to merge?) Fix this by refactoring the function to a sensible flow of checks. Progress towards project-chip#10239
bzbarsky-apple
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 12, 2022
* Fix and refactor ReadSingleClusterData PR #12660 seems to have refactored ReadSingleClusterData in such a way that the access control check may be skipped. (Possibly due to merge?) Fix this by refactoring the function to a sensible flow of checks. Progress towards #10239 * Apply review comment. Co-authored-by: Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]>
Everything in the list is done now except for read events, which will be tracked in a separate issue. |
selissia
pushed a commit
to selissia/connectedhomeip
that referenced
this issue
Jan 28, 2022
* Fix and refactor ReadSingleClusterData PR project-chip#12660 seems to have refactored ReadSingleClusterData in such a way that the access control check may be skipped. (Possibly due to merge?) Fix this by refactoring the function to a sensible flow of checks. Progress towards project-chip#10239 * Apply review comment. Co-authored-by: Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]>
step0035
pushed a commit
to hank820/connectedhomeip
that referenced
this issue
Feb 8, 2022
* Fix and refactor ReadSingleClusterData PR project-chip#12660 seems to have refactored ReadSingleClusterData in such a way that the access control check may be skipped. (Possibly due to merge?) Fix this by refactoring the function to a sensible flow of checks. Progress towards project-chip#10239 * Apply review comment. Co-authored-by: Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: