Skip to content

Fix chip-tool storage ifdefs to make more sense. #80099

Fix chip-tool storage ifdefs to make more sense.

Fix chip-tool storage ifdefs to make more sense. #80099

Re-run triggered September 22, 2023 02:38
Status Success
Total duration 1h 39m 38s
Artifacts
This run and associated checks have been archived and are scheduled for deletion. Learn more about checks retention

build.yaml

on: pull_request
Build on Linux (gcc_debug)
59m 6s
Build on Linux (gcc_debug)
Build on Linux (fake, gcc_release, clang, simulated)
1h 54m
Build on Linux (fake, gcc_release, clang, simulated)
Build on Linux (python_lib)
37m 37s
Build on Linux (python_lib)
Build on Darwin (clang, python_lib, simulated)
1h 39m
Build on Darwin (clang, python_lib, simulated)
Build on Linux (coverage)
17m 4s
Build on Linux (coverage)
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

5 warnings
Build on Linux (gcc_debug)
`pre` execution is not supported for local action from './.github/actions/checkout-submodules-and-bootstrap'
Build on Linux (python_lib)
`pre` execution is not supported for local action from './.github/actions/checkout-submodules-and-bootstrap'
Build on Linux (coverage)
`pre` execution is not supported for local action from './.github/actions/checkout-submodules-and-bootstrap'
Build on Linux (fake, gcc_release, clang, simulated)
`pre` execution is not supported for local action from './.github/actions/checkout-submodules-and-bootstrap'
Build on Darwin (clang, python_lib, simulated)
`pre` execution is not supported for local action from './.github/actions/checkout-submodules-and-bootstrap'