You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, it is possible that Gen.random(beta, 0.01, 0.01) samples 0,1 leading to a Inf in the logpdf which in turn leads to nans in associated log scores.
not sure if there is much to do, but the source was difficult for me to locate and perhaps it will save someone time.
Given that Inf loglikelihoods should be impossible (not 100% sure), perhaps there can be a check for this a runtime when the logscore is being computed? happy to chip in where possible
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, it is possible that
Gen.random(beta, 0.01, 0.01)
samples0,1
leading to aInf
in the logpdf which in turn leads tonan
s in associated log scores.this is due to a problem illustrated over in
Distributions.jl
JuliaStats/Distributions.jl#1003not sure if there is much to do, but the source was difficult for me to locate and perhaps it will save someone time.
Given that
Inf
loglikelihoods should be impossible (not 100% sure), perhaps there can be a check for this a runtime when the logscore is being computed? happy to chip in where possibleThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: