-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add handling of private aggregation paggResponse field in response #15
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@brusshamilton PTAL, thanks! |
filteringId was supported since M128 on Chrome, and B&A are just focusing on features available before M120 at this moment.
an optional `desired total size`, an optional list of `interest group owners` to | ||
include each with an optional `desired size`, and the [HPKE] `public key` and |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The extra "and" was intentional here, as a way of grouping the key with its key ID. We could change the second "and" to "with" if you think that would be more clear.
This algorithm takes as input all of the `relevant interest groups`, and a config | ||
consisting of the `publisher`, | ||
This algorithm takes as input all of the `relevant interest groups`, a config | ||
consisting of the `publisher`, a map of from (origin, string) tuple to origin |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would have thought we could calculate ig pagg coordinators
from the relevant interest groups
. I think we'd rather do that than have it as a separate argument.
@@ -471,7 +472,8 @@ tuple. | |||
larger than request. | |||
1. Encrypt `request` using the `public key` and its `key id` as in | |||
{{request-encryption}} to get the `encrypted message` and `hpke context`. | |||
1. Let the `request context` be the tuple (`included_groups`, `hpke context`) | |||
1. Let the `request context` be the tuple | |||
(`included_groups`, `hpke context`, `ig pagg coordinators`). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make more sense to expand included_groups
to be a list of (name, pagg coordinator) pairs? That would avoid the extra redundancy.
No description provided.