Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Develop minimal working version without support for parallel runs and vector-valued functions #15

Conversation

PhilipHildebrand
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is for merging the fixed error computation of the partitioned-heat-equation tutorial into develop. Furthermore, any tests of the adapter regarding vector functions have been removed, because vector functions are currently not working.
Important to note is that executing the tests via python3 setup.py test fails for some reason; executing the tests/ test suites individually does work however.

BenjaminRodenberg and others added 30 commits November 30, 2021 14:50
Partitioned heat conduction seems to be working now, at least there are no more errors. However, there's still a lot that's commented out because it hasn't been adapted to dolfinx yet.
The latest version of dolfinx is required to run the case!
@PhilipHildebrand PhilipHildebrand changed the title Merge partitioned heat equation into develop & removed failing vector function tests Develop minimal working version without support for parallel runs and vector-valued functions Dec 15, 2022
@BenjaminRodenberg
Copy link
Member

Some of the problems with the linter are originating from dead links. This is related to #12 and we should fix this directly on develop. I will quickly create a corresponding PR.

@BenjaminRodenberg
Copy link
Member

Some of the problems with the linter are originating from dead links. This is related to #12 and we should fix this directly on develop. I will quickly create a corresponding PR.

I took care about this in #18 and synchronized this PR to develop. The links should be working now.

Copy link
Member

@BenjaminRodenberg BenjaminRodenberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we are close to done here. @PhilipHildebrand can you take care of the unneeded vertex types? I will then do a final review and merge.

Copy link
Member

@BenjaminRodenberg BenjaminRodenberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. There are issues for the open points, namely parallelization #22, minor updates in the CI #21, removing the dirty fix #17 and allow vector functions #9.

fenicsxprecice/adapter_core.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@BenjaminRodenberg BenjaminRodenberg merged commit 955b964 into precice:develop Jan 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants