-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Core & multiple modules: strict purpose 1 consent option; do not require vendor consent for "core" storage / ID modules #8661
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a6b51b3
Allow sharedId to work without vendor consent
dgirardi ec40ee6
Remove superfluous enforcement check from ixBidAdapter
dgirardi e0a8e59
Make core storage respect device access rules
dgirardi 2e3f643
respect storage access enforcement in userSync.js
dgirardi 96044fc
UserID: check whether storage is enabled only once consent can be enf…
dgirardi 071f344
Add pubProvidedId
dgirardi 1010f0f
GDPR enforcement: enforce consent when data is not available, but GDP…
dgirardi 9c258c1
Always enforce deviceAccess; move vendorless storage P1 enforcement b…
dgirardi f939bdd
Merge branch 'master' into storage-consent
dgirardi 3d9fe37
Merge branch 'master' into storage-consent
dgirardi File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://github.com/prebid/Prebid.js/blob/master/modules/pubProvidedIdSystem.js also doesnt need consent but doesn't use device storage. Should it be on this list?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It does look like it should, but now I'm wondering, aren't all 3 doing the same thing? should we think about removing some at some point?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the second one is definitely redundant and removing it is in the 8.0 proposal. PPID module is different, it allows a publisher to set any arbitrary id and also say what it is. It isn't very popular, but it would allow a publisher to say pass hash(login) or some other identifier that was quite different than the one used by sharedid / pubcommonid