Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating zookeeper charts #173

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 13, 2020
Merged

Updating zookeeper charts #173

merged 4 commits into from
May 13, 2020

Conversation

SrishT
Copy link
Contributor

@SrishT SrishT commented May 11, 2020

Signed-off-by: SrishT [email protected]

Change log description

Updates the Zookeeper Operator charts.

How to verify it

Zookeeper Operator and zookeeper cluster should be deployed successfully both manually and using charts.

@anishakj anishakj self-requested a review May 11, 2020 10:49
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 11, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #173 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #173   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   47.89%   47.89%           
=======================================
  Files           6        6           
  Lines         952      952           
=======================================
  Hits          456      456           
  Misses        467      467           
  Partials       29       29           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6fd0216...500c281. Read the comment docs.

@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
replicas: 3
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! I found myself making this same change here: derekm@99fa885

persistence:
accessModes: [ "ReadWriteOnce" ]
storageClassName: {{ .Values.storage.className }}
reclaimPolicy: Delete
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we add reclaimPolicy also in values.yaml

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

SrishT added 2 commits May 13, 2020 11:43
Copy link
Contributor

@anishakj anishakj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@anishakj anishakj merged commit 1e82393 into pravega:master May 13, 2020
@anishakj anishakj mentioned this pull request May 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants