Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use scontrol instead of sacct to get status of finished tasks. #52

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 7, 2020

Conversation

yichen88
Copy link
Contributor

The sacct command would failed when slurm DB is not accessible for some reason, and then the whole slurm computation manager could not continue to work.

From this slurm schema image(https://slurm.schedmd.com/arch.gif), the scontrol command is not depends on slurm DB.

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use '[x]' to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ? If so, link to this issue using '#XXX' and skip the rest
#51

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API? If yes, check the following:

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration guide has been updated in the github wiki (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

Other information:

(if any of the questions/checkboxes don't apply, please delete them entirely)

The sacct command would failed when slurm DB is not accessible for some reason, and then the whole slurm computation manager could not continue to work.

From this slurm schema image(https://slurm.schedmd.com/arch.gif), the scontrol command is not depends on slurm DB.

Signed-off-by: yichen88 <[email protected]>
@sylvlecl sylvlecl self-requested a review October 20, 2020 14:47
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities (and Security Hotspot 0 Security Hotspots to review)
Code Smell A 4 Code Smells

94.9% 94.9% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

Copy link
Contributor

@sylvlecl sylvlecl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code is OK : waiting for more integrated tests before merging.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 7, 2020

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 4 Code Smells

94.9% 94.9% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants