Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Put back Cassandra implementation #156

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024
Merged

Put back Cassandra implementation #156

merged 25 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024

Conversation

rolnico
Copy link
Member

@rolnico rolnico commented Sep 16, 2024

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
No

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Feature

What is the current behavior?
No Cassandra implementation

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Cassandra implementation is back and available with Java 17

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please check if the following requirements are fulfilled

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration steps are described in the following section

What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR? (migration steps)

Other information:

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rol <[email protected]>
@rolnico rolnico self-assigned this Sep 16, 2024
CR36053T and others added 5 commits September 17, 2024 09:48
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rol <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rol <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rol <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rol <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rol <[email protected]>
@rolnico rolnico force-pushed the nro/cassandra_is_back branch from a2eaf22 to a0c9616 Compare September 17, 2024 08:20
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rol <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rol <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rol <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rol <[email protected]>
@rolnico rolnico requested a review from EtienneLt September 17, 2024 14:22
}

private void executeStatements(List<SimpleStatement> statements) {
for (SimpleStatement statement : statements) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont know but should it be better if it was a batch ?

private CassandraUtil() {
}

public static void print(CassandraContext context, PrintStream out) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

well these method add print, I dont know if it is usefull but a Logger would be better

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not even sure these methods are used, I'll have to check later

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rol <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rol <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rol <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rol <[email protected]>
Copy link

@rolnico rolnico merged commit 1502ea8 into main Oct 21, 2024
6 checks passed
@rolnico rolnico deleted the nro/cassandra_is_back branch October 21, 2024 09:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants