-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 643
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(vanilla): customizable atom.unstable_is #2356
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3339108
feat(vanilla): customizable atom.is
dai-shi 85a8770
minor change
dai-shi 3185a13
refactor
dai-shi b7b66bf
do not depend on this for atom.is
dai-shi de438fd
make default atom functions stable
dai-shi 226ce3a
revert to this
dai-shi 787b018
mark unstable for now
dai-shi 3b6440d
Merge branch 'main' into feat/vanilla/customizable-atom-is
dai-shi 2b2e3e7
Merge branch 'main' into feat/vanilla/customizable-atom-is
dai-shi File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought about requiring this property rather than making it optional, but as we want to release this as a patch, let's do this.
Eventually, if it makes sense (like moving to
class
syntax), we can consider changing it a required property.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A scenario needs to be considered: A global atom
anAtom
has two copiescopy1
andcopy2
, it is possible thatcopy1
internally callsset(copy2, value)
(socopy1.is(copy2)
should evals to true). Therefore, even with this change, we still needs to add another property in jotai-scope's intercepted copy to mark two copies as having the same original atom.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, does it mean it requires to be
is?: (self: Atom<unknown>, target: Atom<unknown>) => boolean
and doesn't usethis
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, for the jotai-scope PR, there is no need to do so.
Personally, I think the term should not be called
is
, asis
suggests equality and equality is symmetric, while in this case it is not.https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/cmp/trait.PartialEq.html