Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use Case: Cross-Version Support #357

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2022
Merged

Use Case: Cross-Version Support #357

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2022

Conversation

jjhursey
Copy link
Member

@jjhursey jjhursey commented Aug 5, 2021

  • A use case the details the cross-version compatibility needs of a PMIx implementation.

@jjhursey jjhursey added the WorkInProgress Work In Progress label Aug 5, 2021
@jjhursey jjhursey requested review from SteVwonder and spophale August 5, 2021 16:10
@jjhursey jjhursey added this to the PMIx v5 Standard milestone Aug 5, 2021
SteVwonder
SteVwonder reviewed Aug 10, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@SteVwonder SteVwonder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @jjhursey! Just a couple of comments

App_Use_Cases.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
App_Use_Cases.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
App_Use_Cases.tex Show resolved Hide resolved
App_Use_Cases.tex Show resolved Hide resolved
SteVwonder
SteVwonder reviewed Aug 11, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@SteVwonder SteVwonder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks @jjhursey!

@jjhursey jjhursey added Use Case Description of a Use Case and removed WorkInProgress Work In Progress labels Sep 28, 2021
@jjhursey jjhursey marked this pull request as ready for review September 28, 2021 15:58
@jjhursey jjhursey force-pushed the xversion-uc branch 2 times, most recently from d9b64e8 to 2a9160a Compare September 28, 2021 16:00
@jjhursey
Copy link
Member Author

Please use emoji reactions ON THIS COMMENT to indicate your position on this proposal.

  • You do not need to vote on every proposal
  • If you have no opinion, don't vote - that is also useful data
  • If you've already commented on this issue, please still vote so
    we know your current thoughts
  • Not all proposals solve exactly the same problem, so we may end
    up accepting proposals that appear to have some overlap
    This is not a binding majority-rule vote, but it will be a very
    significant input into the corresponding ASC decision.

Here are the meanings for the emojis:

  • Hooray or Rocket: I support this so strongly that I
    want to be an advocate for it
  • Heart: I think this is an ideal solution
  • Thumbs up: I'd be happy with this solution
  • Confused: I'd rather we not do this, but I can tolerate it
  • Thumbs down: I'd be actively unhappy, and may even consider
    other technologies instead
    If you want to explain in more detail, feel free to add another
    comment, but please also vote on this comment.

@jjhursey jjhursey added the Eligible Eligible for consideration by ASC label Sep 28, 2021
@jjhursey
Copy link
Member Author

jjhursey commented Nov 3, 2021

PMIx ASC 4Q 2021

  • Passed the first vote: 12 yes / 0 no / 1 abstain
  • This is eligible for second vote in the 1Q 2022 ASC quarterly meeting

@jjhursey jjhursey added the First Vote Passed ASC first vote passed label Nov 3, 2021
@jjhursey
Copy link
Member Author

jjhursey commented Mar 7, 2022

PMIx ASC 1Q 2022

  • Passed the second vote: 11 yes / 0 no / 0 abstain
  • This is can be merged into main/v5 branches once conflicts are addressed (I'll work on that)

@jjhursey jjhursey added the Accepted as Stable ASC second vote passed. Accepted as Stable! label Mar 7, 2022
@jjhursey
Use Case: Cross-Version Support
e906d00 
 * A use case the details the cross-version compatibility
   needs of a PMIx implementation.

Signed-off-by: Joshua Hursey <[email protected]>
@jjhursey
Copy link
Member Author

jjhursey commented Mar 7, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Editorial: Rebased the reference branch without text changes to prepare to merge.

This is only intended for master/v5

@jjhursey jjhursey merged commit 6e13889 into pmix:master Mar 7, 2022
@jjhursey jjhursey deleted the xversion-uc branch March 7, 2022 21:20
@jjhursey jjhursey mentioned this pull request Jan 12, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@SteVwonder SteVwonder SteVwonder left review comments

@rhc54 rhc54 rhc54 left review comments

@spophale spophale Awaiting requested review from spophale

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Accepted as Stable ASC second vote passed. Accepted as Stable! Eligible Eligible for consideration by ASC First Vote Passed ASC first vote passed Use Case Description of a Use Case
Projects
None yet
Milestone
PMIx v5 Standard
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@jjhursey @SteVwonder @rhc54