-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Continuous improvement #678
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces modifications to the Plugwise helper classes and utility functions, focusing on renaming and refactoring the home location identifier handling. The changes primarily affect the Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
plugwise/util.py (1)
159-161
: LGTM! Consider adding type hints for clarityThe change ensures temperature values are consistently returned as floats, which is good. Consider adding a type hint comment to clarify the return type for temperature measurements.
# Return for instance 20 (degrees) as 20.0 if unit == TEMP_CELSIUS: + # Always returns float for temperature measurements result = float(measure)
plugwise/helper.py (2)
236-237
: LGTM! Consider adding docstring comments.The separation of
_home_loc_id
(str) and_home_location
(etree) improves type safety and clarity. Consider adding docstring comments to explain their distinct purposes.+ # ID of the home location self._home_loc_id: str + # XML element representing the home location self._home_location: etree
765-770
: LGTM! Consider adding debug logging for missing temperature data.The gateway outdoor temperature collection is correctly implemented. Consider adding debug logging when temperature data is not found to aid in troubleshooting.
if (found := self._home_location.find(locator)) is not None: value = format_measure(found.text, NONE) data.update({"sensors": {"outdoor_temperature": value}}) self._count += 1 + else: + LOGGER.debug("No outdoor temperature data found in home location")
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
plugwise/helper.py
(8 hunks)plugwise/legacy/helper.py
(7 hunks)plugwise/util.py
(1 hunks)scripts/tests_and_coverage.sh
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
scripts/tests_and_coverage.sh (1)
46-47
: Consider keeping coverage reporting enabled
The coverage reporting has been commented out, which may impact the ability to track test coverage metrics. Consider either:
- Keeping both commands to maintain coverage reporting while having debug logging
- Adding a command-line flag to toggle between coverage and debug modes
✅ Verification successful
Coverage reporting can be safely re-enabled
Based on the verification:
- Coverage configuration exists in
pyproject.toml
under[tool.coverage.run]
- The project is set up to track coverage for the
plugwise
source directory - No CI/CD workflows were found that depend on coverage reporting
- The debug mode with
-xrpP --log-level debug
can coexist with coverage reporting
Recommendation: Uncomment the coverage command and run both commands to maintain coverage metrics while having debug logging:
PYTHONPATH=$(pwd) pytest -qx tests/ --cov='.' --no-cov-on-fail --cov-report term-missing
PYTHONPATH=$(pwd) pytest -xrpP --log-level debug tests/
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if coverage reporting is used in CI/CD
gh workflow list --all | grep -i coverage
Length of output: 43
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if coverage reporting is used in other CI/CD files or configurations
fd -e yml -e yaml | xargs rg -i 'coverage|pytest.*cov'
# Check if coverage is mentioned in any Python configuration files
fd -e toml -e ini | xargs rg -i 'coverage|pytest.*cov'
# Check if there are any coverage reports or configurations in the repository
fd -g '*coverage*'
Length of output: 184
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of pyproject.toml for coverage configuration
cat pyproject.toml
# Check if there are any other test-related scripts or configurations
fd -e sh | xargs rg -i 'pytest'
# Look for any GitHub Actions workflow files
fd -e yml -e yaml -p '.github/workflows'
Length of output: 19319
plugwise/legacy/helper.py (1)
297-303
: LGTM! Improved comment clarity
The comments now better explain the outdoor temperature data source and potential empty locations scenario.
plugwise/helper.py (2)
315-318
: LGTM! Home location handling is correct.
The code properly handles:
- Assignment of home location ID for non-thermostat devices
- Identification of home location by name "Home"
- Storage of both the ID and XML element for future use
Also applies to: 397-403
Line range hint 355-374
: LGTM! P1 smartmeter info collection is well-implemented.
The code:
- Correctly uses the XML element to access module data
- Maintains backward compatibility through entity ID swapping
- Includes proper error handling for missing module data
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #678 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 20 20
Lines 3469 3450 -19
=========================================
- Hits 3469 3450 -19 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good work!
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation