Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Continuous improvement #678

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Dec 22, 2024
Merged

Continuous improvement #678

merged 16 commits into from
Dec 22, 2024

Conversation

bouwew
Copy link
Contributor

@bouwew bouwew commented Dec 22, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved handling of home location identifiers for enhanced clarity and functionality.
    • Streamlined measurement formatting and error handling.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Clarified logic for outdoor temperature data retrieval.
  • Documentation

    • Updated changelog to include a new "Ongoing" section for continuous improvements.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 22, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces modifications to the Plugwise helper classes and utility functions, focusing on renaming and refactoring the home location identifier handling. The changes primarily affect the SmileHelper and SmileLegacyHelper classes, updating how home location data is managed. The modifications include renaming _home_location to _home_loc_id, adjusting method implementations, and improving data retrieval logic across multiple files. Additionally, utility functions in util.py have been enhanced with improved measurement formatting and error handling. A new section in the changelog documents ongoing improvements.

Changes

File Change Summary
plugwise/helper.py - Renamed _home_location to _home_loc_id
- Updated methods to use new location identifier
- Modified data retrieval logic for home locations
plugwise/legacy/helper.py - Renamed _home_location to _home_loc_id
- Updated method references and comments
plugwise/util.py - Enhanced format_measure to directly convert measure to float
- Updated common_match_cases function logic for low battery status
CHANGELOG.md - Added new "Ongoing" section
- Included "Continuous improvements" entry

Suggested labels

quality

Suggested reviewers

  • CoMPaTech

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Refactoring Rhyme 🔧
In helper's halls, a change takes flight,
Renaming vars with coding might.
From location to loc_id we stride,
Improving logic, taking pride.
A plugwise dance of clean design! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f2880b7 and 566f266.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • plugwise/legacy/helper.py (7 hunks)
  • plugwise/util.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • plugwise/legacy/helper.py
  • plugwise/util.py

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
plugwise/util.py (1)

159-161: LGTM! Consider adding type hints for clarity

The change ensures temperature values are consistently returned as floats, which is good. Consider adding a type hint comment to clarify the return type for temperature measurements.

 # Return for instance 20 (degrees) as 20.0
 if unit == TEMP_CELSIUS:
+    # Always returns float for temperature measurements
     result = float(measure)
plugwise/helper.py (2)

236-237: LGTM! Consider adding docstring comments.

The separation of _home_loc_id (str) and _home_location (etree) improves type safety and clarity. Consider adding docstring comments to explain their distinct purposes.

+        # ID of the home location
         self._home_loc_id: str
+        # XML element representing the home location
         self._home_location: etree

765-770: LGTM! Consider adding debug logging for missing temperature data.

The gateway outdoor temperature collection is correctly implemented. Consider adding debug logging when temperature data is not found to aid in troubleshooting.

         if (found := self._home_location.find(locator)) is not None:
             value = format_measure(found.text, NONE)
             data.update({"sensors": {"outdoor_temperature": value}})
             self._count += 1
+        else:
+            LOGGER.debug("No outdoor temperature data found in home location")
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5806452 and 98be2b9.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • plugwise/helper.py (8 hunks)
  • plugwise/legacy/helper.py (7 hunks)
  • plugwise/util.py (1 hunks)
  • scripts/tests_and_coverage.sh (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
scripts/tests_and_coverage.sh (1)

46-47: Consider keeping coverage reporting enabled

The coverage reporting has been commented out, which may impact the ability to track test coverage metrics. Consider either:

  1. Keeping both commands to maintain coverage reporting while having debug logging
  2. Adding a command-line flag to toggle between coverage and debug modes
✅ Verification successful

Coverage reporting can be safely re-enabled

Based on the verification:

  • Coverage configuration exists in pyproject.toml under [tool.coverage.run]
  • The project is set up to track coverage for the plugwise source directory
  • No CI/CD workflows were found that depend on coverage reporting
  • The debug mode with -xrpP --log-level debug can coexist with coverage reporting

Recommendation: Uncomment the coverage command and run both commands to maintain coverage metrics while having debug logging:

PYTHONPATH=$(pwd) pytest -qx tests/ --cov='.' --no-cov-on-fail --cov-report term-missing
PYTHONPATH=$(pwd) pytest -xrpP --log-level debug tests/
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if coverage reporting is used in CI/CD
gh workflow list --all | grep -i coverage

Length of output: 43


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if coverage reporting is used in other CI/CD files or configurations
fd -e yml -e yaml | xargs rg -i 'coverage|pytest.*cov'

# Check if coverage is mentioned in any Python configuration files
fd -e toml -e ini | xargs rg -i 'coverage|pytest.*cov'

# Check if there are any coverage reports or configurations in the repository
fd -g '*coverage*'

Length of output: 184


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of pyproject.toml for coverage configuration
cat pyproject.toml

# Check if there are any other test-related scripts or configurations
fd -e sh | xargs rg -i 'pytest'

# Look for any GitHub Actions workflow files
fd -e yml -e yaml -p '.github/workflows'

Length of output: 19319

plugwise/legacy/helper.py (1)

297-303: LGTM! Improved comment clarity

The comments now better explain the outdoor temperature data source and potential empty locations scenario.

plugwise/helper.py (2)

315-318: LGTM! Home location handling is correct.

The code properly handles:

  1. Assignment of home location ID for non-thermostat devices
  2. Identification of home location by name "Home"
  3. Storage of both the ID and XML element for future use

Also applies to: 397-403


Line range hint 355-374: LGTM! P1 smartmeter info collection is well-implemented.

The code:

  1. Correctly uses the XML element to access module data
  2. Maintains backward compatibility through entity ID swapping
  3. Includes proper error handling for missing module data

plugwise/legacy/helper.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (5806452) to head (566f266).
Report is 17 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #678   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           20        20           
  Lines         3469      3450   -19     
=========================================
- Hits          3469      3450   -19     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bouwew bouwew marked this pull request as ready for review December 22, 2024 09:42
@bouwew bouwew requested a review from a team as a code owner December 22, 2024 09:42
Copy link
Member

@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good work!

@bouwew bouwew merged commit 9fae322 into main Dec 22, 2024
19 checks passed
@bouwew bouwew deleted the improve-241222 branch December 22, 2024 12:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants