-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sinkv2(ticdc): add interfaces #6017
sinkv2(ticdc): add interfaces #6017
Conversation
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please remove the following files:
cdc/sinkv2/ddlsink/mq/.keep
cdc/sinkv2/ddlsink/mysql/.keep
return | ||
} | ||
resolvedEvents := e.eventBuffer[:i] | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what is the relationship between the event and the txnevent?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
event can be txnevent
or rowchangeevent
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
// Assert TableSink implementation
var _ TableSink = (*eventTableSink[*model.RowChangedEvent])(nil)
var _ TableSink = (*eventTableSink[*model.SingleTableTxn])(nil)
Want to rely on these files to agree on package directories. |
60f9efc
to
25b13bd
Compare
29ae08c
to
9bad97e
Compare
Codecov Report
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. @@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #6017 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 57.2815% 57.6198% +0.3382%
================================================
Files 680 696 +16
Lines 80230 82515 +2285
================================================
+ Hits 45957 47545 +1588
- Misses 30009 30634 +625
- Partials 4264 4336 +72 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
self check
ff0bf0d
to
f109449
Compare
/LGTM |
/merge |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 7695a55
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Self check
/run-dm-integration-test |
@hi-rustin: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you. At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you: /run-all-tests If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
/run-dm-integration-test |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #5928
What is changed and how it works?
Check List
Tests
No need
Questions
Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
No
Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?
No
Release note