-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tests: specify tidb commit #10589
tests: specify tidb commit #10589
Conversation
/retest-required |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: asddongmen, CharlesCheung96 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. @@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #10589 +/- ##
================================================
- Coverage 57.5843% 57.5755% -0.0088%
================================================
Files 849 849
Lines 125984 125984
================================================
- Hits 72547 72536 -11
- Misses 48007 48014 +7
- Partials 5430 5434 +4 |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #10588
What is changed and how it works?
all checksum integration tests is failed because of upstream tidb changes, in this PR we use a specified tidb commit to run integration tests
Check List
Tests
Questions
Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?
Release note
```release-noteNone`.