executor: refactor the BaseExecutor and remove session context in ProjectionExec

[YangKeao]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #54613

Problem Summary:

Similar to #51397. This PR uses the BaseExecutorV2 and removed the session context in the ProjectionExec.

What changed and how does it work?

1. Remove the BaseExecutor internal and replace it with BaseExecutorV2.
2. Add a new projectionExecutorContext, which includes all information needed by the projection executor.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.
    No logic change. It shouldn't break existing tests.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 55.8487%. Comparing base (ac786cb) to head (1ef0fa9).
Report is 17 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #54614         +/-   ##
=================================================
- Coverage   72.7696%   55.8487%   -16.9210%     
=================================================
  Files          1549       1672        +123     
  Lines        436487     612383     +175896     
=================================================
+ Hits         317630     342008      +24378     
- Misses        99294     247004     +147710     
- Partials      19563      23371       +3808     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	37.1833% <100.0000%> (?)
unit	71.7433% <100.0000%> (-0.0519%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	52.9656% <ø> (ø)
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	52.5609% <ø> (+6.7103%)	⬆️

[YangKeao]

/retest

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lcwangchao, xhebox

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [lcwangchao,xhebox]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-07-16 02:14:50.54881434 +0000 UTC m=+320112.539755811: ☑️ agreed by xhebox.
• 2024-07-17 03:29:09.578081324 +0000 UTC m=+410971.569022789: ☑️ agreed by lcwangchao.