expression: fail ColumnSubstituteImpl if creating function returns error

[YangKeao]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #53580, close #53582, close #53603, close #53594

Problem Summary:

The following ColumnSubstituteImpl will fail if it returns nil for a function argument.

What changed and how does it work?

This PR makes the ColumnSubstituteImpl fail if the NewFunction returns an error. I traced back the change in ColumnSubstituteImpl function. Maybe the only reason why NewFunctionInternal is used here is that the developers were quite confident that it'll not return an error, and at that time the ColumnSubstituteImpl function didn't return the second value to indicate whether it successes or not.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

Fix the issue that the planner will panic if the predicates have error after column substitution.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.5612%. Comparing base (b137425) to head (2985696).
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #53716        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   72.5762%   74.5612%   +1.9849%     
================================================
  Files          1506       1506                
  Lines        430947     431070       +123     
================================================
+ Hits         312765     321411      +8646     
+ Misses        98878      89751      -9127     
- Partials      19304      19908       +604     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	49.1737% <100.0000%> (?)
unit	71.4666% <40.0000%> (-0.1042%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	53.9957% <ø> (ø)
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	50.3390% <ø> (+8.5046%)	⬆️

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-06-03 07:32:02.014821839 +0000 UTC m=+3280075.771957410: ☑️ agreed by qw4990.
• 2024-06-03 08:01:08.286595494 +0000 UTC m=+3281822.043731068: ☑️ agreed by AilinKid.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AilinKid, qw4990, XuHuaiyu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [AilinKid,XuHuaiyu,qw4990]
• pkg/expression/OWNERS [XuHuaiyu]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-6.5: #53815.

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.5: #54191.

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.1: #54192.

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.1: #54193.