util/chunk: optimize (*ListInDisk).GetChunk and add a fast row container reader (#45130)

[ti-chi-bot]

This is an automated cherry-pick of #45130

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #45125

Problem Summary:

The existing reading method of RowContainer (GetChunk(...)) is not fast enough for dumping a lot of rows from disk (for the cursorFetch use case).

The existing Iterator4RowContainer is even slower, as it allocates a new chunk for each row 🤦.

This PR is extracted from #44730 (with a some refractor).

What is changed and how it works?

This PR pipelines the IO and CPU calculation, to make full use of the IO bandwidth. It should also help other features using rowContainer, as GetChunk is now much faster.

The performance of existing benchmark BenchmarkListInDisk_GetChunk increases from 2877471ns/op to 462864ns/op

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No code

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tiancaiamao, xhebox

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [tiancaiamao,xhebox]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2023-07-10 06:05:59.920992605 +0000 UTC m=+312051.691331320: ☑️ agreed by xhebox.
• 2023-07-10 06:09:13.129212613 +0000 UTC m=+312244.899551326: ☑️ agreed by tiancaiamao.

[purelind]

/test all

[tiprow]

@purelind: No presubmit jobs available for pingcap/[email protected]

In response to this:

/test all

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.