Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix charges/invoices listing by using stripe API #630

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: original
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ivellios
Copy link

@ivellios ivellios commented Feb 6, 2019

What's this PR do?

As described in #623 invoices is no longer available in the pulled stripe customer data, thus pulling invoices list from the stripe API separately with customer id. Suggested by @polski-g in his comment: https://github.com/pinax/pinax-stripe/issues/623\#issuecomment-455814540

Same goes for charges as noted by the user in the comment.

Any background context you want to provide?

What ticket or issue # does this fix?

Closes #623

Definition of Done (check if considered and/or addressed):

  • Are all backwards incompatible changes documented in this PR?
  • Have all new dependencies been documented in this PR?
  • Has the appropriate documentation been updated (if applicable)?
  • Have you written tests to prove this change works (if applicable)?

@ivellios
Copy link
Author

ivellios commented Feb 6, 2019

I see no backwards incompatible changes that should be documented in this PR.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 6, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #630 into master will decrease coverage by 0.2%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #630      +/-   ##
========================================
- Coverage   99.21%    99%   -0.21%     
========================================
  Files          33     33              
  Lines        1911   1911              
  Branches      175    175              
========================================
- Hits         1896   1892       -4     
- Misses          7      9       +2     
- Partials        8     10       +2
Flag Coverage Δ
#py27dj110 98.69% <0%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
#py27dj111 98.69% <0%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
#py27dj18 98.95% <0%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
#py34dj110 98.69% <0%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
#py34dj111 98.69% <0%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
#py34dj18 98.95% <0%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
#py34dj20 98.69% <0%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
#py35dj110 98.69% <0%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
#py35dj111 98.69% <0%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
#py35dj18 98.95% <0%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
#py35dj20 98.69% <0%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
#py36dj111 98.69% <0%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
#py36dj20 98.69% <0%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
#py36dj20psql 98.69% <0%> (-0.21%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pinax/stripe/actions/invoices.py 96.87% <0%> (-3.13%) ⬇️
pinax/stripe/actions/charges.py 93.33% <0%> (-2.23%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0005850...c818638. Read the comment docs.

def test_sync_invoices_for_customer(self, RetreiveMock, SyncMock):
RetreiveMock().invoices().data = [Mock()]
def test_sync_invoices_for_customer(self, RetrieveMock, SyncMock):
RetrieveMock.return_value = [Mock()]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure this is correct. I believe that stripe.Customer.retrieve isn't actually called anymore. You would need to keep the @patch("pinax.stripe.actions.invoices.sync_invoice_from_stripe_data") and remove the @patch("stripe.Customer.retrieve") patch, which would mean that stripe.Invoice.auto_paging_iter is set to the RetrieveMock and pinax.stripe.actions.invoices.sync_invoice_from_stripe_data is set to the SyncMock.

@patch("stripe.Customer.retrieve")
def test_sync_charges_for_customer(self, RetreiveMock, SyncMock):
RetreiveMock().charges().data = [Mock()]
def test_sync_charges_for_customer(self, RetrieveMock, SyncMock):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment above should also apply here.

@streeter
Copy link
Contributor

I had attempted to fix the invoices method removal (in #622), but didn't know about the auto_paging_iter method. I updated my PR to use that, but keep the code coverage the same.

@paltman paltman changed the base branch from master to 4.x November 26, 2021 15:54
@paltman paltman added the Original The original full pinax-stripe version with cached models and actions service layer label Nov 26, 2021
@paltman paltman changed the base branch from 4.x to original November 26, 2021 17:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Original The original full pinax-stripe version with cached models and actions service layer
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cannot sync customers - KeyError Invoices
4 participants