CI: Better build size debugging #927
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Apr 8, 2024
|
Judging by the before and after of Tiny 2040 (8MB) the ulab module - as configured - weighs in at about 92k. |
|
Having a long, hard think about how much appetite I have to babysit Yet Another Patch 😆 |
Gadgetoid
force-pushed
the
ci/better-debugging
branch
2 times, most recently
from
02df8e4 to
d3691b6
Compare
Add a patch for CMakeLists.txt which adds -Wl,--print-memory-usage so we can get at least some useful information about which builds are running close to the limits.
Using a custom patch against MicroPython's CMakeLists.txt this will optionally use a memmap_mp.ld file from the *board* directory and allow us to check if the allocated app flash overflows. Linker scripts need configured on a per board basis.
This build has plenty of room for fancy extras. Replaces #570
Gadgetoid
force-pushed
the
ci/better-debugging
branch
from
d3691b6 to
cfcbace
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a little bit of a redux of the issue I raised here: micropython/micropython#8680
And the PR here: micropython/micropython#8761
Neither of these have had any traction for a while, due to an impasse with the way flash sizes are declared with Pico's
bi_declbeing incompatible with how we might want to supply (or retrieve from) flash sizes inmemmap_mp.ld.The general idea is to split
FLASHintoAPPandFILESYSTEMso we have an early failure if the two happen to overlap.Without a linker error to catch this, a MicroPython build will generate a filesystem at runtime and overwrite itself in potentially catastrophic ways.
Making this tooling work requires adding an
memmap_mp.ldto each board directory. Since this does not inherit the flash size frommpconfigboard.hit removes the previous "single source of truth" for flash size and... this can easily catch you out.In all cases the linker variable
_flash_app_sizeshould beACTUAL_FLASH_SIZE - MICROPY_HW_FLASH_STORAGE_BYTES. Eg: For Pico this is2048 (2MB) - 1408 (1.4MB) = 640k.