Removed outdated code #993
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: DL6ER <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: DL6ER <[email protected]>
AzureMarker
approved these changes
Aug 31, 2019
|
This pull request has been mentioned on Pi-hole Userspace. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/pi-hole-4-3-2-release-notes/23852/1 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm the following:
git rebase)git commit --signoff)What does this PR aim to accomplish?:
Fix a bug caused by old code where we removed features only partially. The bug has been discovered on Discourse. It is not a high-priority bug as it is only triggered when a user sets two seldomly used flags manually in
setupVars.conf.How does this PR accomplish the above?:
Remove the left over code parts and fix the IDs in the Javascript file.
What documentation changes (if any) are needed to support this PR?:
None, this is a bugfix.