Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new blocked by database status and NONE reply type #1869

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2021

Conversation

DL6ER
Copy link
Member

@DL6ER DL6ER commented Aug 23, 2021

By submitting this pull request, I confirm the following:

  • I have read and understood the contributors guide, as well as this entire template.
  • I have made only one major change in my proposed changes.
  • I have commented my proposed changes within the code.
  • I have tested my proposed changes, and have included unit tests where possible.
  • I am willing to help maintain this change if there are issues with it later.
  • I give this submission freely and claim no ownership.
  • It is compatible with the EUPL 1.2 license
  • I have squashed any insignificant commits. (git rebase)

What does this PR aim to accomplish?:

Add new "blocked by database" status and NONE reply type

How does this PR accomplish the above?:

Add interpretation for status 15

What documentation changes (if any) are needed to support this PR?:

None

@DL6ER DL6ER requested a review from a team August 23, 2021 08:14
@pralor-bot
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on Pi-hole Userspace. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/behavior-when-database-is-busy/48174/25

@DL6ER DL6ER merged commit 224f906 into release/v5.6 Aug 23, 2021
@DL6ER DL6ER deleted the tweak/blocking_while_busy branch August 23, 2021 18:19
@pralor-bot
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on Pi-hole Userspace. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/pi-hole-ftl-v5-9-web-v5-6-and-core-v5-4-released/49544/1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants