Integrating assertion rewriting (2nd attempt) #626
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…cording to context, interface called on the debugger GUI...)
…reasons: - I don't manage to reset the source code of the modifier method in #tearDown - I willingly raise a TestFailure in my test and I want to catch it but I don't manage to do so
…ip it) + fixing StDebuggerTest>>#tearDown and StTestDebuggerProvider>>#methodThatGeneratesCode
StevenCostiou
approved these changes
Nov 24, 2023
adri09070
added
the
need more work
adri09070
removed
the
need more work
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Based on: https://github.com/dvmason/AssertValueDebugger but more generic because it allows to generate/rewrite not only assertions but actually any type of code.
There is a problem with the test that I wrote and I don't know whym but it works in the base debugger and it won't impact the user if they don't use it
First attempt was #580 but I have way too many conflicts because of auto-refactorings linked to Tonel