-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Covid19 #140
Merged
Merged
Covid19 #140
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a64e1e0
increased max kmer freq to 10000000 for high coverage amplicon datasets
jrober84 6c5b566
increased max kmer freq to 10000000 for high coverage amplicon datasets
jrober84 0f45df1
removed qc_message column from k-mer results because it is highly red…
jrober84 34d8e99
removed qc_message column from k-mer results because it is highly red…
jrober84 37afbea
added minimum k-mer fraction as additional filtering option
jrober84 cdc7004
improved documentation of the new kmer filtering function
jrober84 cb9f22e
fixed issue with using count of position instead of frequency
jrober84 a4d5572
enhanced detailed report with additional information and df no longer…
jrober84 8a1c62c
updated tests with new fields for read kmer reports
jrober84 15aa720
simplified calc kmer fraction function
jrober84 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -228,6 +228,24 @@ def parallel_query_reads(reads: List[Tuple[List[str], str]], | |
outputs = [x.get() for x in res] | ||
return outputs | ||
|
||
def filter_by_kmer_fraction(df,min_kmer_frac=0.05): | ||
"""Filter out noisy kmers from high coverage datasets | ||
|
||
Args: | ||
df: BioHansel k-mer frequence pandas df | ||
min_kmer_frac: float 0 - 1 on the minimum fraction a kmer needs to be to be considered valid | ||
|
||
Returns: | ||
- pd.DataFrame with k-mers which satisfy the min-fraction | ||
""" | ||
position_counts = df['refposition'].value_counts().rename_axis('position').reset_index(name='counts') | ||
valid_indexes = [] | ||
for index,row in df.iterrows(): | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'd recommend using for row in df.itertuples():
refposition = row.refposition # cannot do string based access (row['refposition']) with tuples You could also look into using apply instead of using a for-loop: def get_kmer_fraction(row):
total_freq = position_frequencies.get(row.refposition, 0)
return row.freq / total_freq if total_freq > 0 else 0.0
df['kmer_fraction'] = df.apply(get_kmer_fraction, axis=1)
df['total_refposition_kmer_frequency'] = df.apply(lambda row: position_frequencies.get(row.refposition, 0), axis=1) |
||
frac = row['refposition'] / position_counts.loc[position_counts['position'] == row['refposition'], 'counts'].iloc[0] | ||
if frac > min_kmer_frac: | ||
valid_indexes.append(index) | ||
return df[df.index.isin(valid_indexes)] | ||
|
||
|
||
def subtype_reads(reads: Union[str, List[str]], | ||
genome_name: str, | ||
|
@@ -285,6 +303,9 @@ def subtype_reads(reads: Union[str, List[str]], | |
df['subtype'] = subtypes | ||
df['is_pos_kmer'] = ~df.kmername.str.contains('negative') | ||
df['is_kmer_freq_okay'] = (df.freq >= subtyping_params.min_kmer_freq) & (df.freq <= subtyping_params.max_kmer_freq) | ||
#apply a scaled approach for filtering of k-mers required for high coverage amplicon data | ||
df = filter_by_kmer_fraction(df,subtyping_params.min_kmer_frac) | ||
|
||
st.avg_kmer_coverage = df['freq'].mean() | ||
st, df = process_subtyping_results(st, df[df.is_kmer_freq_okay], scheme_subtype_counts) | ||
st.qc_status, st.qc_message = perform_quality_check(st, df, subtyping_params) | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @jrober84 I'm having trouble understanding what this function is supposed to do.
Is kmer fraction supposed to be like the alternate allele fraction (AF) from variant calling?
What is a noisy kmer? Any kmer that is observed at a low frequency relative to the sum of frequencies of all kmers observed at that position?
kmer_freq / sum(kmer_freqs_at_position) < min_kmer_frac
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @peterk87, I have updated the description in the code to be a bit more clear. But essentially, the function determines the total number of positive and negative kmers covering a position and then determines the percentage of the total coverage each k-mer for the position contributes. In the case where only a single k-mer is present it will always be one and will not ever be filtered. But when both positive and negative are present it will see if the percentage contribution of each k-mer to the total is above the set threshold. If it isn't that specific k-mer gets filtered from the data frame and so the QA/QC module will never see it. I would say this process has some similarity to the AF for variant calling but also will allow the user to configure an acceptable "contamination" level for their sample which for their application is not an issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @jrober84
I'm not sure this code is doing what your description says it's doing. I don't see any accessing of kmer frequency values. If I'm interpreting your description above and in the docstring correctly, you need to be calculating the sum of kmer frequencies at each position. With
.value_counts()
onrefposition
you're simply getting a count of how many times you observe eachrefposition
value (similar to Python's Counter). It also doesn't make sense that therefposition
count is being divided by therefposition
value.Also, when possible, I think it's a better idea to include all results for the detailed results report for debugging and troubleshooting rather than filtering those results out. I would instead just modify this line:
biohansel/bio_hansel/subtyper.py
Line 289 in d20a00b
Where instead of just getting the subset of results where
is_kmer_okay
, kmers that pass the kmer fraction threshold could also be filtered for:This way no results are removed from the detailed report, and only the "good" kmers are used to determine the subtype result.
So I would propose adding columns like
kmer_fraction
and maybetotal_refposition_kmer_frequency
anddoes_pass_kmer_fraction_threshold
. This would be useful information for potential contamination detection.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a good suggestion, I have updated the code to no longer be filtering the df for failed k-mers. This way all detected k-mers will appear in the detailed report but the QA/QC will be only on the pass list. Pass kmers must pass both the k-mer freq filter and k-mer frac filter. I have added the additional fields that you suggested for troubleshooting purposes.