Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI Test against PowerShell 5.1 #794

Closed
alx9r opened this issue Jun 29, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

CI Test against PowerShell 5.1 #794

alx9r opened this issue Jun 29, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@alx9r
Copy link
Member

alx9r commented Jun 29, 2017

I'm guessing that the CI server is probably using PowerShell 5.0.10586.51 for the v5 tests. I'm inferring this from the ToolFoundations project whose CI is on the same server. From the admin pages of that project I have not found any signs of PowerShell 5.1. (I'm a TeamCity noob, so I apologize if I have this wrong.)

It seems like at least late version(s) Pester should be tested against PowerShell 5.1.

@it-praktyk
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure if I understand what is a subject of your request.

Would you like extend continues integration tests of Pester to PowerShell v. 5.0.10586.51 also?

@alx9r
Copy link
Member Author

alx9r commented Jun 30, 2017

@it-praktyk The other way around: I would like to extend the coninuous integration tests of Pester to PowerShell 5.1. Currently the latest seems to be 5.0.10586.51.

@it-praktyk
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, exactly I thought about that - means test Pester with/under new version of PowerShell.

IMHO, extending CI workflow is not needed before publishing v.4 RTM - probably most of use use this version on development machines. The person who can do it is @dlwyatt but I think that his knowledge/time/involvement is more required for other tasks.

@dlwyatt
Copy link
Member

dlwyatt commented Aug 13, 2017

I patched the build agents today; it's running 5.1 now.

@dlwyatt dlwyatt closed this as completed Aug 13, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants