Define OpaqueValue
#4550
Merged
Define OpaqueValue
#4550
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
serban300
added
R0-silent
svyatonik
approved these changes
May 23, 2024
bkchr
approved these changes
May 23, 2024
bkchr
reviewed
May 23, 2024
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
bkontur
approved these changes
May 23, 2024
Merged
via the queue into
paritytech:master
with commit May 23, 2024
03bbc17
149 of 152 checks passed
hitchhooker
pushed a commit
to ibp-network/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2024
Define `OpaqueValue` and use it instead of `grandpa::OpaqueKeyOwnershipProof` and `beefy:OpaqueKeyOwnershipProof` Related to paritytech#4522 (comment) We'll need to introduce a runtime API method that calls the `report_fork_voting_unsigned()` extrinsic. This method will need to receive the ancestry proof as a paramater. I'm still not sure, but there is a chance that we'll send the ancestry proof as an opaque type. So let's introduce this `OpaqueValue`. We can already use it to replace `grandpa::OpaqueKeyOwnershipProof` and `beefy:OpaqueKeyOwnershipProof` and maybe we'll need it for the ancestry proof as well. --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
TarekkMA
pushed a commit
to moonbeam-foundation/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 2, 2024
Define `OpaqueValue` and use it instead of `grandpa::OpaqueKeyOwnershipProof` and `beefy:OpaqueKeyOwnershipProof` Related to paritytech#4522 (comment) We'll need to introduce a runtime API method that calls the `report_fork_voting_unsigned()` extrinsic. This method will need to receive the ancestry proof as a paramater. I'm still not sure, but there is a chance that we'll send the ancestry proof as an opaque type. So let's introduce this `OpaqueValue`. We can already use it to replace `grandpa::OpaqueKeyOwnershipProof` and `beefy:OpaqueKeyOwnershipProof` and maybe we'll need it for the ancestry proof as well. --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <[email protected]>
This was referenced Aug 21, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Define
OpaqueValueand use it instead ofgrandpa::OpaqueKeyOwnershipProofandbeefy:OpaqueKeyOwnershipProofRelated to #4522 (comment)
We'll need to introduce a runtime API method that calls the
report_fork_voting_unsigned()extrinsic. This method will need to receive the ancestry proof as a paramater. I'm still not sure, but there is a chance that we'll send the ancestry proof as an opaque type.So let's introduce this
OpaqueValue. We can already use it to replacegrandpa::OpaqueKeyOwnershipProofandbeefy:OpaqueKeyOwnershipProofand maybe we'll need it for the ancestry proof as well.