Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(rpc/ots): implement ots_getTransactionBySenderAndNonce #9263
feat(rpc/ots): implement ots_getTransactionBySenderAndNonce #9263
Changes from all commits
05bdf18
cd6b9bf
2f1b0df
926037b
93d6b63
3b23448
faccf61
0d40dce
a660092
48b1d5d
18f89b0
bf2ae53
215139f
2535101
12fdd69
946ad01
c54470a
7fa342a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the change is not correct, if found nonce in block N, need to get txs in block N, not N-1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think so from reading this comment https://github.com/ledgerwatch/erigon/blob/cfb55a3cd44736ac092003be41659cc89061d1be/turbo/jsonrpc/otterscan_transaction_by_sender_and_nonce.go#L118-L121
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Erigon is searching nonce from the
AccountsHistory
table by tx index, but we are searching in the block body instead, so the implementation is different.eg: if we found the nonce changed in block 10, then iterate the txs in block 9 can't get anything.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if you added some test to show this, I would be strongly convinced! you can compare without output from region tests for same inputs