Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: use op feature for engine local #13454

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

mattsse
Copy link
Collaborator

@mattsse mattsse commented Dec 19, 2024

closes #13440

this is non problematic. we use op for these cases, otherwise zepter does complain

@mattsse mattsse enabled auto-merge December 19, 2024 11:42
@github-actions github-actions bot added A-consensus Related to the consensus engine A-op-reth Related to Optimism and op-reth A-sdk Related to reth's use as a library C-debt A clean up/refactor of existing code labels Dec 19, 2024
@mattsse mattsse added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 19, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 7a3e6d8 Dec 19, 2024
43 checks passed
@mattsse mattsse deleted the matt/use-op-feature-for-engine-local branch December 19, 2024 14:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-consensus Related to the consensus engine A-op-reth Related to Optimism and op-reth A-sdk Related to reth's use as a library C-debt A clean up/refactor of existing code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Separate OP payload builder in new engine
2 participants