Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adds
excludes
field tojvm_artifact
targets #14715Adds
excludes
field tojvm_artifact
targets #14715Changes from 3 commits
0cb38fc
4191737
05bd25b
0820ce0
12b9e19
8796b32
654e1a1
94f5c8c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
excludes_digest
is usually empty, I'm not sure if it's worth making this merge conditional for performance, but the code is cleaner if we always run, even in no-op cases.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This equivalent field in Pants v1 was called
excludes
.exclude_dependencies
seems wordy. Any reason to not use the same name as from v1?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it wasn't immediately clear to me what we would be excluding, but if we're happy with
excludes
we can go with it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(I've made that change)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It may be possible to do some rudimentary sanity checking of this value, if defined, but given we don't actually implement the parse algorithm ourselves, there are limits here.
The Coursier error message is actually quite bad when parses fail (you get
java.lang.String@0xetc
representations instead of the actual string values in the exception logs). I'll report (and patch?!) that upstream, where we can probably get a more reasonable error message.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See: coursier/coursier#2386
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See also: https://github.com/coursier/coursier/pull/2387/files