Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Move graph cycle detection to rust. (#11202)" #11272

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2020

Conversation

stuhood
Copy link
Member

@stuhood stuhood commented Dec 8, 2020

#11202 introduced a lot of contention on the GIL that was only obvious when larger numbers of targets were being built. #11270 is a holistic fix for that issue, but it is currently blocked on #11269.

In the meantime, we will land #11271 to dodge the original issue in #11201 to get us back to a medium-slow-but-working state, and then follow up on #11269 and #11270 to get us to the best place.

This reverts commit fabcb45.

[ci skip-build-wheels]

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 8, 2020

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 0.0% when pulling 8334152 on stuhood:stuhood/revert-11202 into 4f8fef3 on pantsbuild:master.

@stuhood stuhood force-pushed the stuhood/revert-11202 branch from 6f6c41e to 8334152 Compare December 8, 2020 22:25
@stuhood stuhood merged commit 9c11a5e into pantsbuild:master Dec 8, 2020
@stuhood stuhood deleted the stuhood/revert-11202 branch December 8, 2020 23:16
stuhood added a commit to stuhood/pants that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2020
…sbuild#11272)

In the meantime, we will land pantsbuild#11271 to dodge the original issue in pantsbuild#11201 to get us back to a medium-slow-but-working state, and then follow up on pantsbuild#11269 and pantsbuild#11270 to get us to the best place.

This reverts commit fabcb45.

[ci skip-build-wheels]
stuhood added a commit to stuhood/pants that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2020
…sbuild#11272)

In the meantime, we will land pantsbuild#11271 to dodge the original issue in pantsbuild#11201 to get us back to a medium-slow-but-working state, and then follow up on pantsbuild#11269 and pantsbuild#11270 to get us to the best place.

This reverts commit fabcb45.

[ci skip-build-wheels]
stuhood added a commit to stuhood/pants that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2020
…sbuild#11272)

In the meantime, we will land pantsbuild#11271 to dodge the original issue in pantsbuild#11201 to get us back to a medium-slow-but-working state, and then follow up on pantsbuild#11269 and pantsbuild#11270 to get us to the best place.

This reverts commit fabcb45.

[ci skip-build-wheels]
stuhood added a commit to stuhood/pants that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2020
…sbuild#11272)

In the meantime, we will land pantsbuild#11271 to dodge the original issue in pantsbuild#11201 to get us back to a medium-slow-but-working state, and then follow up on pantsbuild#11269 and pantsbuild#11270 to get us to the best place.

This reverts commit fabcb45.

[ci skip-build-wheels]
stuhood added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2020
…11272) (#11277)

#11202 introduced a lot of contention on the GIL that was only obvious when larger numbers of targets were being built. #11270 is a holistic fix for that issue, but it is currently blocked on #11269.

In the meantime, we will land #11271 to dodge the original issue in #11201 to get us back to a medium-slow-but-working state, and then follow up on #11269 and #11270 to get us to the best place.

This reverts commit fabcb45.

[ci skip-build-wheels]
stuhood added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2020
…11272) (#11275)

#11202 introduced a lot of contention on the GIL that was only obvious when larger numbers of targets were being built. #11270 is a holistic fix for that issue, but it is currently blocked on #11269.

In the meantime, we will land #11271 to dodge the original issue in #11201 to get us back to a medium-slow-but-working state, and then follow up on #11269 and #11270 to get us to the best place.

This reverts commit fabcb45.

[ci skip-build-wheels]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants