Cleanup inconsistency in take_exposure call

[wtgee]

The base method and sbig expect *args, **kwargs. Warning messages were appearing in the tests for the simulator.

@AnthonyHorton I'm tagging you because you cleaned up the code so are more familiar with what would be the expected behaviour. Seems fine to just add the extra args to me.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #457 into develop will increase coverage by 0.13%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #457      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage     67.4%   67.53%   +0.13%     
===========================================
  Files           63       63              
  Lines         5289     5289              
  Branches       738      738              
===========================================
+ Hits          3565     3572       +7     
+ Misses        1525     1516       -9     
- Partials       199      201       +2

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pocs/camera/simulator.py	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
pocs/state/machine.py	88.27% <0%> (-0.69%)	⬇️
pocs/serial_handlers/protocol_arduinosimulator.py	74.8% <0%> (-0.39%)	⬇️
pocs/observatory.py	71.7% <0%> (-0.28%)	⬇️
pocs/state/states/default/pointing.py	75.51% <0%> (+20.4%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7c3d2fb...5c20e2d. Read the comment docs.

[AnthonyHorton]

Looks good to me.