-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix AttributeError when groupby as_index=False on empty DataFrame #35324
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -605,6 +605,14 @@ def test_as_index_select_column(): | |
tm.assert_series_equal(result, expected) | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_groupby_as_index_select_column_sum_empty_df(): | ||
# GH 35246 | ||
df = DataFrame(columns=["A", "B", "C"]) | ||
left = df.groupby(by="A", as_index=False)["B"].sum() | ||
assert type(left) is DataFrame | ||
assert left.to_dict() == {"A": {}, "B": {}} | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. can you change this test to be more like (and closer to the issue op)
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. this is great. I was struggling with IndexType |
||
|
||
|
||
def test_groupby_as_index_agg(df): | ||
grouped = df.groupby("A", as_index=False) | ||
|
||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if you leave this unchanged, does it work to put another try/except in the else
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
self._aggregate_multiple_funcs
also raiseAttributeError
and this will change the behavior in that case.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that nesting exception handling is not ideal, maybe an isinstance check for a Series instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
between nesting exception handling and explicit type-checking (also nesting inside another exception handling), I think the first one is less evil :). what do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
from a static typing perspective, the isinstance is probably better. In this case, an AttributeError should be easily avoided. hasattr is not ideal from a static typing/mypy perspective either. However, leave it as a try/except for now and see what others think.