-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DOC: update the pandas.DataFrame.plot.hist docstring #20155
Merged
jorisvandenbossche
merged 12 commits into
pandas-dev:master
from
liopic:docstring_plot.hist
Mar 19, 2018
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d77de8a
DOC: improve the docstring of DataFrame.plot.hist()
liopic 28f1043
DOC: Improve pandas.DataFrame.plot.hist docstring
liopic a494111
DOC: Remove unnecesary empty line in pandas.DataFrame.plot.hist docst…
liopic ddd6ebf
DOC: improve the pandas.DataFrame.plot.hist docstring
liopic a395983
DOC: improve the pandas.DataFrame.plot.hist docstring
liopic bc6dbac
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into docstring_plot.hist
liopic ccadb34
DOC: fix issues in DataFrame.plot.hist docstring
liopic df05060
DOC: fix details in DataFrame.plot.hist docstring
liopic dbed27e
DOC: fix PEP8 in DataFrame.plot.hist docstring
liopic 37adb70
DOC: Improve DataFrame.plot.hist docstring
liopic 53b43aa
DOC: Improve example in DataFrame.plot.hist docstring
liopic 627170e
pep8
jorisvandenbossche File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The "or ndarray of them" was not correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, it was not correct. This function always returns one matplotlib.AxesSubplot. It's different than DataFrame.hist(), which returns an ndarray.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just looked, and the key to get this is passing
subplots=True
, then the different columns are each plotted in a subplot in instead of in overlay, en then you get an ndarray of axesThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. However this is actually a parameter that is passed on to the plot() function, but it's not part of the default plot.hist() parameters... so IMHO it's ok to say that the return will be just one. Don't you think so?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, we should still document it here, since this is what the return value of this function can be.
(btw, you are welcome to add
subplots
to the list of Parameters, we have a general issue about that we should document more of those common parameters in each of the methods)