Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Masking and overflow checks for datetimeindex and timedeltaindex ops #18020

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Nov 4, 2017
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions doc/source/whatsnew/v0.21.1.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ Documentation Changes
Bug Fixes
~~~~~~~~~
- Bug in ``DataFrame.resample(...).apply(...)`` when there is a callable that returns different columns (:issue:`15169`)
- Bug in :class:`TimedeltaIndex` subtraction could incorrectly overflow when ``NaT`` is present (:issue:`17791`)
- Bug in :class:`DatetimeIndex` subtracting datetimelike from DatetimeIndex could fail to overflow (:issue:`18020`)

Conversion
^^^^^^^^^^
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion pandas/core/indexes/datetimelike.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ def __sub__(self, other):
return self._add_delta(-other)
elif is_integer(other):
return self.shift(-other)
elif isinstance(other, datetime):
elif isinstance(other, (datetime, np.datetime64)):
return self._sub_datelike(other)
elif isinstance(other, Period):
return self._sub_period(other)
Expand Down
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions pandas/core/indexes/datetimes.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
import pandas.core.dtypes.concat as _concat
from pandas.errors import PerformanceWarning
from pandas.core.common import _values_from_object, _maybe_box
from pandas.core.algorithms import checked_add_with_arr

from pandas.core.indexes.base import Index, _index_shared_docs
from pandas.core.indexes.numeric import Int64Index, Float64Index
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -767,7 +768,7 @@ def _sub_datelike(self, other):
raise TypeError("DatetimeIndex subtraction must have the same "
"timezones or no timezones")
result = self._sub_datelike_dti(other)
elif isinstance(other, datetime):
elif isinstance(other, (datetime, np.datetime64)):
other = Timestamp(other)
if other is libts.NaT:
result = self._nat_new(box=False)
Expand All @@ -777,7 +778,8 @@ def _sub_datelike(self, other):
"timezones or no timezones")
else:
i8 = self.asi8
result = i8 - other.value
result = checked_add_with_arr(i8, -other.value,
arr_mask=self._isnan)
result = self._maybe_mask_results(result,
fill_value=libts.iNaT)
else:
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion pandas/core/indexes/timedeltas.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -361,7 +361,8 @@ def _add_datelike(self, other):
else:
other = Timestamp(other)
i8 = self.asi8
result = checked_add_with_arr(i8, other.value)
result = checked_add_with_arr(i8, other.value,
arr_mask=self._isnan)
result = self._maybe_mask_results(result, fill_value=iNaT)
return DatetimeIndex(result, name=self.name, copy=False)

Expand Down
34 changes: 34 additions & 0 deletions pandas/tests/indexes/datetimes/test_arithmetic.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -199,6 +199,40 @@ def test_ufunc_coercions(self):
tm.assert_index_equal(result, exp)
assert result.freq == 'D'

def test_datetimeindex_sub_timestamp_overflow(self):
dtimax = pd.to_datetime(['now', pd.Timestamp.max])
dtimin = pd.to_datetime(['now', pd.Timestamp.min])

tsneg = Timestamp('1950-01-01')
ts_neg_variants = [tsneg,
tsneg.to_pydatetime(),
tsneg.to_datetime64().astype('datetime64[ns]'),
tsneg.to_datetime64().astype('datetime64[D]')]

tspos = Timestamp('1980-01-01')
ts_pos_variants = [tspos,
tspos.to_pydatetime(),
tspos.to_datetime64().astype('datetime64[ns]'),
tspos.to_datetime64().astype('datetime64[D]')]

for variant in ts_neg_variants:
with pytest.raises(OverflowError):
dtimax - variant

expected = pd.Timestamp.max.value - tspos.value
for variant in ts_pos_variants:
res = dtimax - variant
assert res[1].value == expected

expected = pd.Timestamp.min.value - tsneg.value
for variant in ts_neg_variants:
res = dtimin - variant
assert res[1].value == expected

for variant in ts_pos_variants:
with pytest.raises(OverflowError):
dtimin - variant


# GH 10699
@pytest.mark.parametrize('klass,assert_func', zip([Series, DatetimeIndex],
Expand Down
20 changes: 20 additions & 0 deletions pandas/tests/indexes/timedeltas/test_arithmetic.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -576,6 +576,26 @@ def test_add_overflow(self):
to_timedelta(['7 seconds', pd.NaT, '4 hours']))
tm.assert_index_equal(result, exp)

def test_timedeltaindex_add_timestamp_nat_masking(self):
# GH17991 checking for overflow-masking with NaT
tdinat = pd.to_timedelta(['24658 days 11:15:00', 'NaT'])

tsneg = Timestamp('1950-01-01')
ts_neg_variants = [tsneg,
tsneg.to_pydatetime(),
tsneg.to_datetime64().astype('datetime64[ns]'),
tsneg.to_datetime64().astype('datetime64[D]')]

tspos = Timestamp('1980-01-01')
ts_pos_variants = [tspos,
tspos.to_pydatetime(),
tspos.to_datetime64().astype('datetime64[ns]'),
tspos.to_datetime64().astype('datetime64[D]')]

for variant in ts_neg_variants + ts_pos_variants:
res = tdinat + variant
assert res[1] is pd.NaT

def test_tdi_ops_attributes(self):
rng = timedelta_range('2 days', periods=5, freq='2D', name='x')

Expand Down