-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 135
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat : upgraded the app with consensus module to SDK v0.50.0 #1038
Conversation
Check #1036 PR review comments. Apply relevant changes here too. |
Also #1044 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still there are few things need to be updated.
Check #1036 (review)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only one small thing from my end.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, final review to @aleem1314
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@byte-bandit if everything looks good in this module, lets merge with v0.50.0-upgrade branch. so that we will update other modules accordingly which uses consensus module. |
@byte-bandit do we not want checks to be passing before we merge? |
@taariq I don't think that's realistic. Changing each module separately is going to break all tests and CI. It's not great, but not horrible. We definitely want a full green CI pipeline before merging back to master though, with updated and expanded test coverage. |
@deepan95dev I disabled the need for green CI for now, but we need a cleaner commit history. I suggest to go over the the 50 pending commits, rebase and fixup where useful. Please use conventional commits. We require signatures as well: https://docs.github.com/en/authentication/managing-commit-signature-verification/about-commit-signature-verification Once that's done, feel free to mege. |
@deepan95dev Actually, I enabled the linter again. There's no reason why we should not keep it green. Please make sure it passes as well. |
Hey @byte-bandit , We need to fix the |
@aleem1314 Is there a way we can keep the |
I don't think it is possible, because few modules are pointing to SDK v0.47.x and few modules pointing to v0.50.x. |
Okay, let's keep it rolling. Need for linters removed for |
5d73fa2
Pull request was closed
5d73fa2
to
ca03ff4
Compare
ca03ff4
to
4547389
Compare
@byte-bandit rebase has been done. Please approve to merge this PR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
@aleem1314 Need your final review here as well to merge. Thanks! |
No description provided.