This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 25, 2021. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 887
Single line ignore switches #1175
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c98f11d
updating tests to support new one line switch comments
patsissons bb88b32
updating regex and rule map to support -line and -next-line
patsissons af710b3
track the starting position of each line. provide the switch parser w…
patsissons 23df6ce
handle current line and next line switch comments
patsissons 0aebc61
cleaning up code by using node line, col, position conversion functions.
patsissons File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be:
position: this.getStartOfLinePosition(node, startingPosition, 1),
?Possible that the current version is fine, I just don't understand what it's doing exactly
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The third param is line offset, which defaults to 0, the current line. For current line switches we want to start at the beginning of the current line, so line offset isn't necessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for the lack of clarity, I was referring to if
position: scanner.getTextPos() + 1,
should be changedThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh sorry, i see what you were trying to say now. Either version should yield the same position.
scanner.getTextPos()
returns the position of the end of thetextcurrently parsed token, the+1
is just to bump the position to the beginning of the next line. I guess that the current expression may be a little terse, I could add an extra comment for clarity if you like?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No worries, the comment above is clear enough! Just wanted to check that this was as intended. PR merged!