Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: P4ADEV-1777 implement client retrieve single reporting #20

Merged

Conversation

domenicogi
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

List of Changes

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Pre-Deploy Test
    • Unit
    • Integration (Narrow)
  • Post-Deploy Test
    • Isolated Microservice
    • Broader Integration
    • Acceptance
    • Performance & Load

Types of changes

  • PATCH - Bug fix (backwards compatible bug fixes)
  • MINOR - New feature (add functionality in a backwards compatible manner)
  • MAJOR - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • CHORE - Minor Change (fix or feature that don't impact the functionality e.g. Documentation or lint configuration)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

serdimic and others added 30 commits January 22, 2025 18:07
…orting_list

# Conflicts:
#	src/main/resources/application.yml
…rieve_reporting_list' into P4ADEV-1776-implement_client_retrieve_reporting_list
…ntsReportingController.java

Co-authored-by: antonioT90 <[email protected]>
…reporting/PaymentsReportingService.java

Co-authored-by: antonioT90 <[email protected]>
@domenicogi domenicogi merged commit d761895 into develop Feb 6, 2025
13 checks passed
@domenicogi domenicogi deleted the P4ADEV-1777-implement_client_retrieve_single_reporting branch February 6, 2025 08:22
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.4.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants